Most real estate funding mistakes come from asking the wrong lender at the wrong stage. A bank that is perfect for construction finance legally cannot fund your land; an AIF that will happily fund a stalled project is needlessly expensive for a sanctioned, RERA-registered build. Getting the capital pool matched to the project stage is the single biggest lever on what you pay and whether you fund at all.
In short: Real estate funding in India comes from three pools — banks (construction and refinance only, never land), NBFC-HFCs (land, TDR, premium, construction, inventory) and Category-II AIFs (mezzanine, last-mile and special situations). Match each stage to the pool whose mandate, LTV and speed fit it, and bridge expensive early-stage debt into cheaper bank capital as the project de-risks.
The three capital pools
Banks are the cheapest capital, but the most constrained. Under RBI’s Master Circular on Housing Finance, banks cannot fund a private builder’s land acquisition — they enter only at the construction stage, once RERA registration and approvals are in place, and again later for lease rental discounting and refinance. Expect the lowest pricing but the strictest prerequisites.
NBFC-HFCs (NHB/RBI-regulated housing finance companies) fill the gap banks can’t. They fund land, TDR and premium, construction and inventory — more flexible on stage and structure, at higher pricing than banks but well below equity.
Category-II AIFs (SEBI-registered alternative investment funds) provide the risk capital neither banks nor HFCs will: mezzanine debt between senior debt and equity, last-mile capital for stalled projects, and special-situations funding. The most expensive of the three, and mandated for exactly the risk the others step back from.
The stage-by-stage map
| Stage | Who funds | Typical LTV | Indicative rate |
|---|---|---|---|
| Land acquisition | NBFC-HFC, AIF (banks barred) | ~40–55% | ~14–18% |
| TDR / premium FSI | NBFC-HFC, AIF | ~50–65% | ~13–17% |
| Construction | Bank, NBFC-HFC | ~60–65% | ~10–14% |
| Inventory (post-OC) | NBFC-HFC, AIF | ~50–60% | ~11–14% |
| Last-mile / stalled | SWAMIH, AIF, ARC | Cost-to-complete | structured |
| Refinance / LRD | Bank, HFC | up to ~70% | ~9–11% |
Indicative only — actual terms vary by lender, location, asset class and sponsor. The pattern, not the precise number, is what matters.
The principle that ties it together: sequencing
A project rarely uses one structure. The skill is sequencing — funding the early, banks-can’t stages (land, TDR and premium) with NBFC-HFC or AIF capital, then refinancing into a cheaper bank construction facility the moment RERA and approvals land, and finally unlocking completed stock or refinancing the stabilised asset. Each rupee should be priced to the stage it funds, and expensive early debt should never outstay its purpose.
This is also why the lender decision is not really about rates on day one — it is about the whole capital stack over the project’s life. A slightly more expensive but faster NBFC-HFC that lets you start now, and bridges cleanly into a bank loan later, often beats a cheaper bank that can’t fund you for another nine months.
Where an adviser earns its fee
The pools don’t advertise which stage they’ll fund, on what terms, this quarter — appetite shifts constantly. An independent adviser who works across all three runs a competitive process, sequences the stack, and structures the bridges so the cost compresses as the project de-risks. At Finnova, every mandate is CA + ex-banker–led, across banks, NBFC-HFCs and Category-II AIFs — see real estate funding for the full lifecycle, or structured finance for the mezzanine layer.
Key takeaways
- Three pools, different mandates: banks (construction/refinance, never land), NBFC-HFCs (land to inventory), Category-II AIFs (mezzanine, last-mile, special situations).
- Banks are barred from land by RBI — that capital must come from NBFC-HFCs or AIFs.
- Sequence the stack: fund early stages with HFC/AIF capital, bridge into cheaper bank debt as the project de-risks.
- The right call optimises the whole capital stack over the project’s life, not the headline rate on day one.
FAQ
Which lender is cheapest for a real estate project? Banks offer the lowest pricing (indicatively ~10–12% for construction, ~9–11% for refinance) but only fund RERA-registered construction and stabilised assets — never land. NBFC-HFCs and AIFs cost more but fund the stages banks can’t. The cheapest overall outcome usually combines them: HFC/AIF capital early, refinanced into a bank facility as the project de-risks.
Why can’t a bank fund my land purchase? RBI’s Master Circular on Housing Finance bars banks from extending facilities to private builders for acquiring land. NBFC-HFCs and SEBI Category-II AIFs face no such bar, so land funding comes from them — see land acquisition finance.
Can I use more than one capital pool on the same project? Yes, and most projects do. A common structure funds land via an NBFC-HFC or AIF, refinances into a bank construction loan once approvals land, then unlocks completed stock with inventory funding. Sequencing these is the core of good real estate funding advisory.
What decides which lender will fund my stage? Your project stage, the LTV you need, the title and approval status, the asset class and location, and the lender’s current appetite. An adviser working across all three pools matches the file to the desks most likely to say yes on your terms.
Working on something in this area? Get a straight read from a partner.
Book a consultation →